The pricing page is a feature list with the prices taken out, and that is a choice rather than an oversight — Mycroft publishes what is in each package down to the individual capability, then stops short of the one line you came for.
Visit Mycroft → Affiliate link — the rest of this page is the honest version, including who should skip it.
✓ Pricing re-verified 4 Sep 2026
Mycroft has no public pricing: three packages, and not one number between them. Platform is the entry tier and the only one whose button says Get started rather than something sales-shaped; it bundles the full GRC platform for SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA and more, a Cloud Native Application Protection Platform, security, AI and privacy awareness training, 24/7/365 threat intelligence and monitoring, a Trust Center, and what Mycroft calls basic Agentic AI workflows.
Scale says Book a demo and adds penetration testing, continuous third-party risk management, a customer success manager and expanded AI workflows. Managed says Talk to sales and adds customised frameworks, customised AI workflows and a dedicated CISO who doubles as your success manager. What the page never does is price any of it: no monthly figure, no per-seat rate, no starting-from, no annual floor, not even for the tier you are invited to start by yourself.
We looked past the pricing page before writing that down, because the claim is usually wrong. The FAQ page, the product pages, the CMMC-as-a-Service page and the machine-readable llms.txt all describe the packages in detail and none of them names an amount; the sitemap holds no second pricing page; and the raw HTML of /pricing carries no hidden figure either. So the tiers tell you exactly what you get and leave what you pay entirely to a call. Plans change — always verify the live price on their site.
It matters more here than it would elsewhere, because what Mycroft sells is not a seat of software: it is a platform bundled with a managed service, secure enclaves, infrastructure and identity management, an audit coordinated on your behalf and, at the top, a dedicated CISO. That is a services contract, and services contracts scope on your environment, so the number genuinely will differ per company. It also means you cannot sanity-check the cost against doing it yourself until you have sat through a demo.
The second thing to weigh is how much of the evidence is the vendor talking. What you can verify from outside is a handful of named case studies — SmashSend, Weave, Wisedocs, Unified — and the quotes inside them; there is no published customer count and no independent review base to read. The team is not thin: the CEO holds a CISA, the engineering co-founder a CISSP, and the product co-founder co-founded PartnerStack.
But a young company promising CMMC and FedRAMP outcomes is asking for trust on a timeline where being wrong is expensive. Ask what happens if the assessment does not pass, and ask it before the second call.
Security and compliance platform plus managed service for companies without a security department: a GRC platform mapped to CMMC, FedRAMP, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR, bundled with cloud and application security, device management, third-party risk and awareness training, and backed by a Risk Operations Center staffed by its own experts around the clock. 150+ native integrations across AWS, Azure, GCP and the major code hosts. Three packages — Platform, Scale, Managed — and none of them is publicly priced. Mycroft Technologies Inc.; not the Mycroft AI voice assistant.

Do two things before the demo, because they decide the whole conversation. First, write down which framework the contract actually requires and by when — CMMC, FedRAMP, SOC 2, ISO 27001 — since the scope of your compliance boundary, not your headcount, is what Mycroft prices against. Second, price the alternative honestly on paper: a GRC subscription, a pen test, an auditor and whatever fraction of a security engineer or vCISO you would need, over the same twelve months.
You will not be able to do that comparison during the call, because Mycroft brings the only number and you bring none. Then ask three things on the call and get the answers in writing: what the figure is for your scope, what sits outside it (audit fees and enclave infrastructure especially), and what happens if the assessment does not pass first time. None of that is published anywhere on the site, which is exactly why it is worth asking rather than assuming.
The natural comparison is a self-serve compliance-automation platform — the honest comparison is not feature against feature but model against model. Tools like Vanta, Drata or Secureframe sell you the software that watches your controls and collects the evidence — you still supply the people who fix what it finds, and you still hire the pen tester and the auditor separately. Mycroft sells the software with the people attached: the Risk Operations Center, the remediation, the enclaves, the audit coordination and, on the top tier, a named CISO. If you have the engineers and only want the paperwork automated, the self-serve platform is the cheaper shape and its price is easier to find. Mycroft earns its place when the gap is expertise rather than tooling, and when CMMC or FedRAMP — the frameworks it leads with, and the ones where a generic SOC 2 tool helps least — is what stands between you and the contract.
Everything we publish about Mycroft links back here — the review stays the honest hub:
The ex-banker filter — the same yardstick on every review (how we review): My ex-banker filter is simple: does Mycroft remove a real cost — time, errors, missed revenue — bigger than what it charges? If the job above is genuinely yours, it's worth a look. We never publish fake or “exclusive” prices, so always confirm the current plan on their site.
Judge it on evidence rather than adjectives. Look for a published security page, single sign-on and role controls on the plan you would actually buy (they are often gated to higher tiers), a status page with real incident history, and a clear answer on where your data is stored. If the tool will hold anything sensitive, those four answers matter more than any feature comparison.
This is a researched assessment, not a hands-on test — where we've used a tool ourselves, we say so explicitly. We name what each tool is genuinely good and bad at, and we earn a commission only if you sign up, at no cost to you.
We list our sources because most review sites do not. How we review →
The security tools closest to Mycroft that we have also reviewed. They overlap rather than match:
New dossiers, cost-traps we found, and tools that earned a keep — no hype, no sponsored-disguised-as-advice. Unsubscribe anytime.
This is our researched assessment — not a paid placement. The “Visit” links on this page are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you, and it never changes our take. How we review →
Spotted an error? Tell us — we verify and fix fast, whether or not it flatters the product.